Fascinating case, though I’m not convinced that the first 8 episodes really conveyed the ‘problems with the American justice’. What happened with Deaver in the 2nd batch of episodes elevated this. Candace’s speech in E13 was the climax. The judge’s speech too. The documentary was so so but the case itself was too fascinating. I think he’s guilty.
看前几集还以为是那个新出的电视剧 心想怎么还刻意做成复古伪纪录片风格 没想到是个真纪录片讲的是真的故事 真是假作真时真亦假 因为是真实故事 所以最终也没有人知道真正发生了什么
一个迷人的故事，看到那家人10年来的变化也是够感慨。前半程节奏掌握得很好，每集一个炸弹。后半程的反转令人目瞪口呆，司法体系不用为无辜生命负责的吗？法国人也是厉害，那么多年，坚持下来。20220621
我看过最好的纪录片，可能一辈子都不会有能超过它的了。
丈夫是写小说的，老婆死了以后马上想到找人跟着拍个故事，这就不是一般人能做到的。我能看到的唯一佐证他可能没杀人的是他子女的态度，但她们也不是没动摇过。其他的说法都是瞎扯。但检方确实也没有找到证据能证明他杀了人…我还是倾向认为他是凶手，至少不是好人。
南部真的是又恐同又极度保守
巧合太多那么一定就是有问题
纪录片没新剧有意思
纪录片也是影视作品 能明显看出立场 从biased地呈现事实
不想看了
Fascinating case, though I’m not convinced that the first 8 episodes really conveyed the ‘problems with the American justice’. What happened with Deaver in the 2nd batch of episodes elevated this. Candace’s speech in E13 was the climax. The judge’s speech too. The documentary was so so but the case itself was too fascinating. I think he’s guilty.
法律影视欣赏的作业，记不清事件经过了但真的又臭又长………..叙述也有点混乱呃呃